Skip to main content
Taylor Law Group
APPEALS & POST-CONVICTION RELIEF

Criminal Appeals and Post-Conviction Relief in Tucson

A conviction does not always mean the end of the road. Arizona law provides several avenues for challenging a conviction or sentence after trial.

Understanding the Charge

If you have been convicted of a crime in Arizona, you may have options for challenging that conviction through direct appeal or post-conviction relief under Rule 32 or Rule 33 of the Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure. A direct appeal challenges legal errors that occurred during the trial, while post-conviction relief can address issues such as ineffective assistance of counsel, newly discovered evidence, or constitutional violations.

The appeals process has strict deadlines. A notice of appeal must be filed within 20 days of sentencing for felonies. Post-conviction relief petitions under Rule 33 (formerly Rule 32) have varying deadlines depending on the ground for relief. Missing these deadlines can permanently waive your right to challenge the conviction. If you believe your conviction was unjust or that errors occurred during your trial, consult with an attorney as soon as possible.

Potential Penalties

Direct AppealCan result in reversal of conviction, new trial, or modified sentence; does not involve new evidence
Post-Conviction Relief (Rule 33)Can address ineffective counsel, newly discovered evidence, constitutional violations; may result in new trial or sentence modification
Set-Aside (A.R.S. 13-905)Does not erase conviction but reflects completion of sentence; can improve employment and housing prospects
Sentence ModificationIn some cases, the court may modify an excessive or disproportionate sentence

How Doug Defends

  • Reviewing the trial record for legal errors including improper jury instructions, evidentiary rulings, and prosecutorial misconduct
  • Investigating potential claims of ineffective assistance of counsel based on specific failures of the trial attorney
  • Identifying newly discovered evidence that could not have been obtained at the time of trial and that would likely change the outcome
  • Filing motions to set aside convictions for clients who have completed all terms of their sentence and demonstrated rehabilitation

Doug Taylor's experience on the bench gives him a unique ability to identify the kinds of legal errors that appellate courts take seriously. He understands what constitutes reversible error versus harmless error, and he can evaluate whether a case has genuine appellate merit or whether other post-conviction remedies would be more effective.

Douglas W. Taylor, Sr.Former Pima County Justice Court Judge

Convicted but Still Fighting? There May Be Options.

A former judge can evaluate your case for appellate issues and post-conviction relief opportunities.

Call DougText Doug